Name the section
Group related assessments under a clear working context such as Triage, Commitments, or Support.
# Triage
## Follow-up requested
Does this communication explicitly ask for a follow-up?
### Fact ID
follow_up_requested
### Type evidence
### Max input tokens 2048
### Max output tokens 8
Write the brief. Send the communication. Review the result.
Your team can read, discuss, and revise the same concise brief that Closing Threads uses for the assessment.
The Markdown format
Use familiar Markdown to keep each assessment brief, named, and easy to review.
Group related assessments under a clear working context such as Triage, Commitments, or Support.
State the exact thing the communication should be assessed for in direct, literal language.
Give the result a stable name and set the practical bounds the assessment should respect.
Loose working example
This short brief asks one literal question and names the result. Add more H2 assessments beneath the same H1 when the section needs them.
# Triage
## Follow-up requested
Does this communication explicitly ask
for a follow-up?
### Fact ID
follow_up_requested
### Type
evidence
### Max input tokens
2048
### Max output tokens
8
The promise
The assessment stays the same across every communication sent through it.
The Markdown brief makes the intended judgment easy for people to inspect.
Closing Threads recommends a clear outcome. A person or calling system decides what happens next.
Closing Threads
Bring the communication and a short Markdown brief. Get back an outcome you can review, route, and rely on.
See the example